Upload your rubric and student submissions, and the system evaluates each essay against your exact criteria with detailed, actionable feedback. TAs and instructors managing large enrollment courses cut grading time by 70% while maintaining the academic standards your discipline requires.
Canvas integration means grading happens directly inside your LMS. No exporting files or switching between platforms.
Free to try • No credit card required • Set up in 2 minutes
Canvas Integration
Upload rubrics with as many dimensions as your assignment requires: thesis strength, evidence quality, counterargument engagement, citation accuracy, clarity. Weight each criterion to match your priorities.
The platform evaluates how students construct claims, integrate sources, and build logical progressions. It identifies weak transitions, unsupported assertions, and gaps in reasoning that slow down manual grading.
Philosophy essays get evaluated differently than political science or literature papers. Upload terminology and expectations from your field, and the tool adapts to your discipline's analytical standards.
Essays requiring scholarly sources get evaluated on how effectively students synthesize research. The system identifies citation patterns, source diversity, and whether evidence actually supports the argument.
TAs grading four sections spend 25+ hours per assignment at 15 minutes per essay. The platform reduces that to review time only, freeing up nights and weekends for research or teaching prep.
Batch upload all submissions, apply your rubric, and review generated scores and feedback in a fraction of the manual time.
Grading fatigue means the last 30 essays get less attention than the first 30. The system applies identical standards to every submission, so students in later sections receive the same rigor as earlier ones.
Final scores reflect quality, not your energy level at 11pm.
Office hours become more productive when you're not exhausted from grading marathons. Redirect saved time to discussion facilitation, one-on-one student support, or your own academic work.
Adjuncts managing multiple institutions especially benefit from grading efficiency that doesn't compromise course quality.
Lead professors create master rubrics that TAs apply across all sections. Everyone grades to the same expectations, and the professor reviews flagged essays for consistency.
Coordination becomes simpler when the tool enforces shared criteria automatically.
“Good effort! Try to add more details and check your spelling.”
“Your thesis that economic sanctions are counterproductive is stated in paragraph 1, but your analysis in paragraphs 3-4 shifts to humanitarian impacts without connecting them to your economic argument. Bridge this gap by showing how humanitarian consequences undermine the economic rationale for sanctions.”
Feedback reads like what a professor would write, not what a K-12 teacher tells a middle schooler. Comments address intellectual choices: argument framing, evidence selection, rhetorical strategy.
The system references actual sentences and paragraphs from the submission. Comments point to where the thesis weakens, where evidence doesn't support a claim, or where transitions fail.
Feedback terminology matches what you put in your rubric. If your criteria mention counterargument engagement or historiographical context, comments use that exact framing.
Review and adjust comments before students see them. Add personal notes, soften tone where needed, or emphasize points the system flagged.
Pull assignments and submissions directly from Canvas, grade with the platform, and push scores and feedback back to your gradebook. No file exports or manual uploads.
Students see feedback in Canvas exactly as they would with manual grading.
Lecture courses with 200+ students generate hundreds of essays per assignment. Bulk upload all submissions at once, apply your rubric, and process the entire batch in minutes.
Review outliers or flagged essays individually while accepting scores for straightforward submissions.
Save rubrics semester to semester. Analytical essay rubrics, research paper rubrics, and response paper rubrics stay in your library for reuse.
Adjust criteria as your course evolves without starting from scratch each term.
Student essays remain confidential. The platform doesn't resell data, train external models on your submissions, or share content outside your institution.
FERPA compliance ensures student work stays protected.
Composition, rhetoric, and intro humanities courses with 100+ students per section generate grading volume that exceeds TA capacity. The system handles initial evaluation so TAs focus on office hours and discussion sections.
Political science, sociology, and economics courses require essays that integrate data, theory, and argumentation. The platform evaluates how effectively students synthesize sources and apply frameworks.
Essays that engage with complex texts and abstract concepts benefit from rubrics that assess conceptual clarity and logical coherence. The system flags where arguments lose rigor or misinterpret source material.
Writing centers use the platform to triage submissions before tutor appointments. Students arrive with preliminary feedback, making sessions more productive.
Admissions offices reviewing thousands of application essays use the tool to flag strong narratives and voice. Counselors prioritize reading flagged essays while the system handles initial screening.
Seminar courses and capstone programs require detailed evaluation of extended research papers. The platform handles preliminary assessment of methodology, argumentation, and scholarly contribution so advisors focus on mentorship.
Build rubrics with as many criteria as you need, weighted however you prioritize. Thesis strength might count for 30%, evidence for 25%, and organization for 20%.
The platform applies your exact weighting to every essay, ensuring scores reflect your pedagogical priorities.
The system provides initial scores and feedback, which you review and modify as needed. Flag essays for closer reading, adjust scores based on nuance the platform missed, or override assessments entirely.
Final grades reflect your judgment, not automated output.
Set thresholds so borderline essays or submissions with unusual structures get flagged for your attention. You decide which essays need deeper evaluation.
Most submissions process smoothly while you focus on cases requiring expert judgment.
The system flags potential plagiarism or citation issues, but you make final calls on academic honesty violations. Combine with institutional plagiarism detection tools for comprehensive checks.
Your role as instructor remains central to upholding course integrity.
Grade as many essays as your courses require without worrying about per-submission costs. Pricing stays predictable whether you grade 50 essays or 500.
LMS integration comes standard, no add-on fees or enterprise upsells. Connect your Canvas instance and start grading directly from your course site.
Scale access across an entire writing program or department. Institutional licenses support multiple instructors and courses with centralized billing and admin controls.
Test the platform with your own rubrics and student essays before committing. Trials include full feature access so you experience real grading workflows.