Danielson Framework for Teaching rubric generator. 4 domains — Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, Professional Responsibilities.
Free · No sign-up · PDF export · Any subject or grade
Rubric total will sum to this score.
Paste full instructions or describe in one sentence.
0/5000
Tip: Include the grade level and any standard codes for tighter alignment.
Trusted by innovative teachers at
Every assignment, every subject
Analytic rubrics for essays and projects, holistic rubrics for writing, single-point rubrics for quick formative checks, AP-exam style rubrics for LEQs and DBQs — from a single prompt.
Analytic, holistic, or single-point structure
Criteria and descriptors matched to the assignment
Point totals that hit your target score exactly
Edit any cell before printing or exporting
Argumentative essay · 10th grade · 16 points total
| Criterion | Exceeds | Proficient |
|---|---|---|
Thesis 4 pts | Clear, original, arguable | Clear and defensible |
Evidence 4 pts | 3+ sources, all cited | 2 sources, mostly cited |
Organization 4 pts | Seamless transitions | Logical paragraphs |
Mechanics 4 pts | No errors | 1-2 minor errors |
Classroom-ready output
Paste a standard code (CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP) and criteria tighten to it. Everything is editable: rewrite descriptors, rebalance points, change labels — then print a clean PDF for the binder or attach to your LMS.
CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, C3, AP — paste the code and go
Inline-editable table (click any cell)
Print-ready PDF with headers and gridlines
Pairs with GradeWithAI to auto-grade against the rubric
Analytic, holistic, or single-point
Standards-aligned to CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP
Custom point totals (10, 25, 100, anything)
By subject or assignment type
Editable before printing
Export to PDF, print, or auto-grade
Designed for real classrooms
The small details that make an AI-generated rubric something you'd actually hand a class.
About this tool
The Danielson rubric — formally the Danielson Framework for Teaching — is the most widely used teacher evaluation framework in the United States, adopted in more than 20 states and thousands of districts. Note: this is a rubric teachers are evaluated against, not one used to grade student work. Developed by Charlotte Danielson and refined most recently in the 2022 edition, the framework covers four domains (Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, and Professional Responsibilities) with 22 components scored on four performance levels: Distinguished, Proficient, Basic, and Unsatisfactory. Proficient is the expected competence level for tenured teachers. Our danielson rubric generator above builds any subset of the 22 components with current-edition descriptor language for all four performance levels, ready for peer coaching, formal evaluation, or new-teacher onboarding.
Danielson is deeper than T-TESS at the component level — 22 components versus 16 T-TESS dimensions — but uses fewer performance levels (4 vs. 5). The four-level scale deliberately puts Distinguished above Proficient to signal growth beyond expected practice, and Basic/Unsatisfactory signal the need for support or remediation.
Domain 1 — Planning and Preparation: Knowledge of content/pedagogy, students, outcomes, resources, coherent instruction, student assessment (6 components)
Domain 2 — Classroom Environment: Respect/rapport, culture for learning, procedures, student behavior, physical space (5 components)
Domain 3 — Instruction: Communicating with students, questioning/discussion, engaging students, assessment during instruction, flexibility/responsiveness (5 components)
Domain 4 — Professional Responsibilities: Reflecting on teaching, records, family communication, professional community, professional growth, professionalism (6 components)
Performance levels: Distinguished, Proficient, Basic, Unsatisfactory
Component 3b (Questioning and Discussion Techniques) is the single most common Basic rating in national data — teachers ask many questions but few open-ended or high-cognitive ones, and student-to-student discourse is low. Second is 3c (Engaging Students in Learning), where students are compliant but not cognitively invested. Third, 1f (Designing Student Assessments) often lands at Basic because formative assessment exists but doesn't drive instructional decisions. Getting to Distinguished on any component requires students to be the active agents — leading discussion, self-monitoring, adjusting their own work — not just the teacher doing more.
The generator outputs the 22-component framework at four levels of performance, using the 2022-edition descriptor language. You can narrow to a single domain (common for walk-throughs), a single component (common for peer coaching), or generate the full rubric. Customizations teachers and coaches ask for most: a self-reflection checklist pre-observation, a 'look-fors' version for instructional coaches, a coaching conversation template that pairs each Basic/Proficient/Distinguished descriptor with a growth question, and an IEP-accommodation-aware variant for special education classrooms.
How it works
Paste the full instructions or describe it in one sentence. Include grade level, standards, and the rubric type (analytic/holistic/single-point) if you want.
Criteria and performance descriptors matched to the assignment, sized to the point total you picked.
Click any cell to rewrite. Export a clean PDF, or grade student work against this exact rubric inside GradeWithAI.
Hear from teachers who are saving time and providing better feedback.
“For Chadwick users, GradeWithAI has improved feedback efficiency and effectiveness, as it is grounded in existing platforms and is highly adaptable.”

“More impressive though is that it corrects student answers not simply using a pre-written answer, but by following the thought process they've pursued.”

“I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five.”

“GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded. That is a very valuable thing for the students.”

“GradeWithAI [provides] students with timely individualized feedback on their homework assignments and formative assessments. This is a job that is virtually impossible for a teacher to do on a regular basis.”

“Students have also appreciated the consistency and immediacy of the feedback I can provide through GradeWithAI. This has enabled them to make necessary corrections and achieve their desired scores on any assignment.”

After the rubric
The rubric generator is free forever. When you want to apply the rubric at scale, GradeWithAI scores handwritten and digital student work against it in seconds — per-criterion scores and descriptor-matched feedback.
Upload or sync student work from any LMS
AI grades against the exact rubric you built here
Works with typed and handwritten responses
Per-criterion scores and feedback in every report
Graded 28 essays against rubric
Period 4 · 92% class average · 14 seconds
Ava G.
9/10
Marcus R.
10/10
Priya S.
8/10
Got questions?
Answers to common questions from teachers. Still stuck? Email john@gradewithai.com — replies land the same day.
It varies by district. Some use all 22 components for every observation; many score a priority subset (often the 8-10 components in Domains 2 and 3 that are observable during a single lesson). Domains 1 and 4 are usually evidenced through artifacts like lesson plans and reflection logs rather than direct observation.
Browse by subject, type, or exam
Pre-configured rubric generators for the assignments teachers ask for most — from argumentative essays to AP Lang rhetorical analysis.
Related tools
Join thousands of teachers who save 10+ hours every week with AI-powered rubric building and grading.
Free plan available · No credit card required
Teachers using GradeWithAI report grading in a fraction of the time, with richer feedback for every student.


