Automate your grading prep. Generate clear, objective grading rubrics to assess student work fairly and efficiently.
Free · No sign-up · PDF export · Any subject or grade
Rubric total will sum to this score.
Paste full instructions or describe in one sentence.
0/5000
Tip: Include the grade level and any standard codes for tighter alignment.
Trusted by innovative teachers at
Every assignment, every subject
Analytic rubrics for essays and projects, holistic rubrics for writing, single-point rubrics for quick formative checks, AP-exam style rubrics for LEQs and DBQs — from a single prompt.
Analytic, holistic, or single-point structure
Criteria and descriptors matched to the assignment
Point totals that hit your target score exactly
Edit any cell before printing or exporting
Argumentative essay · 10th grade · 16 points total
| Criterion | Exceeds | Proficient |
|---|---|---|
Thesis 4 pts | Clear, original, arguable | Clear and defensible |
Evidence 4 pts | 3+ sources, all cited | 2 sources, mostly cited |
Organization 4 pts | Seamless transitions | Logical paragraphs |
Mechanics 4 pts | No errors | 1-2 minor errors |
Classroom-ready output
Paste a standard code (CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP) and criteria tighten to it. Everything is editable: rewrite descriptors, rebalance points, change labels — then print a clean PDF for the binder or attach to your LMS.
CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, C3, AP — paste the code and go
Inline-editable table (click any cell)
Print-ready PDF with headers and gridlines
Pairs with GradeWithAI to auto-grade against the rubric
Analytic, holistic, or single-point
Standards-aligned to CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP
Custom point totals (10, 25, 100, anything)
By subject or assignment type
Editable before printing
Export to PDF, print, or auto-grade
Designed for real classrooms
The small details that make an AI-generated rubric something you'd actually hand a class.
About this tool
A grading rubric generator is a tool that produces the scoring grid teachers actually use to put grades in the gradebook — not just a structural template, but a rubric with point values, defensible descriptors, and clear cut scores. The distinction matters: a 'rubric builder' helps you draft a criteria list; a grading rubric generator closes the loop by making sure the rubric maps cleanly to a letter grade or percentage when you're sitting at your kitchen table on Sunday night with 90 essays. What teachers need from a grading rubric specifically is objectivity and defensibility — a parent can ask why their kid got a B+, and the rubric has to give a better answer than 'I felt like it.' Our grading rubric generator above produces rubrics with point math that converts cleanly to any grade scale, descriptor text that's specific enough to defend at a parent conference, and export formats that drop into Canvas, Google Classroom, PowerSchool, and Schoology without reformatting.
A rubric that describes levels of performance isn't the same as a rubric that grades. For grading, the rubric has to do four things: award points that sum to your target total, give clear cut scores between performance bands (what separates a 3 from a 4), use language specific enough that two teachers grading the same essay would land within a point, and convert the rubric score to a gradebook-compatible number (percentage, 4-point scale, standards-based level). Skip any of these and you end up with a rubric that feels fair but leaves you fudging scores when a paper lands between two bands.
Point values that sum cleanly to a grade scale (100-point, 4-point, 20-point, or standards-based)
Cut scores that separate performance bands unambiguously — not 'strong' vs. 'very strong'
Descriptor language specific enough to defend at a parent conference
Inter-rater reliability — two teachers grading the same work should land within 1 point
A score-to-grade conversion that matches district policy (10% = F? 60% = F? Standards-based 1-4?)
Most rubrics get used once and filed in a Google Drive folder nobody reopens. That's a waste: a good grading rubric for a 9th-grade argumentative essay should be reusable for every argumentative essay that year, with only minor edits per prompt. The reason teachers don't reuse is practical — the rubric is tangled up with the specific prompt, the point values don't match the new assignment's weight, or the exemplar column references last quarter's topic. A grading rubric generator solves this by separating the criteria from the prompt. You duplicate the rubric, swap the prompt-specific language, and keep the descriptor text that took you an hour to write the first time.
The generator defaults to a 4-criteria × 4-level analytic rubric totaling 16 points, but you can switch to any point total (20, 25, 50, 100) and it re-balances automatically. You can also weight criteria unequally — content 40%, organization 25%, evidence 25%, conventions 10% — and the generator rewrites the point values per cell to match. Export options include percentage conversion tables, standards-based 1-4 mapping, and a direct-import CSV for most major gradebooks. Common teacher requests: 'drop conventions to 10% of total,' 'convert this 25-point rubric to a standards-based 1-4 scale,' and 'add a comments column that doesn't affect the grade.'
How it works
Paste the full instructions or describe it in one sentence. Include grade level, standards, and the rubric type (analytic/holistic/single-point) if you want.
Criteria and performance descriptors matched to the assignment, sized to the point total you picked.
Click any cell to rewrite. Export a clean PDF, or grade student work against this exact rubric inside GradeWithAI.
Hear from teachers who are saving time and providing better feedback.
“For Chadwick users, GradeWithAI has improved feedback efficiency and effectiveness, as it is grounded in existing platforms and is highly adaptable.”

“More impressive though is that it corrects student answers not simply using a pre-written answer, but by following the thought process they've pursued.”

“I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five.”

“GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded. That is a very valuable thing for the students.”

“GradeWithAI [provides] students with timely individualized feedback on their homework assignments and formative assessments. This is a job that is virtually impossible for a teacher to do on a regular basis.”

“Students have also appreciated the consistency and immediacy of the feedback I can provide through GradeWithAI. This has enabled them to make necessary corrections and achieve their desired scores on any assignment.”

After the rubric
The rubric generator is free forever. When you want to apply the rubric at scale, GradeWithAI scores handwritten and digital student work against it in seconds — per-criterion scores and descriptor-matched feedback.
Upload or sync student work from any LMS
AI grades against the exact rubric you built here
Works with typed and handwritten responses
Per-criterion scores and feedback in every report
Graded 28 essays against rubric
Period 4 · 92% class average · 14 seconds
Ava G.
9/10
Marcus R.
10/10
Priya S.
8/10
Got questions?
Answers to common questions from teachers. Still stuck? Email john@gradewithai.com — replies land the same day.
Speed comes from two things: keep the rubric short (4-6 criteria max; 3-4 performance levels) and grade one criterion across all papers before moving to the next. A 6-criterion rubric on 30 essays is 180 judgments if you grade one essay at a time but feels like 6 passes of 30 quick decisions if you grade criterion-by-criterion. Most teachers cut their grading time 30-40% with that change alone.
Browse by subject, type, or exam
Pre-configured rubric generators for the assignments teachers ask for most — from argumentative essays to AP Lang rhetorical analysis.
Related tools
Join thousands of teachers who save 10+ hours every week with AI-powered rubric building and grading.
Free plan available · No credit card required
Teachers using GradeWithAI report grading in a fraction of the time, with richer feedback for every student.


