Rubrics aligned with the International Baccalaureate Extended Essay criteria.
Free · No sign-up · PDF export · Any subject or grade
Rubric total will sum to this score.
Paste full instructions or describe in one sentence.
0/5000
Tip: Include the grade level and any standard codes for tighter alignment.
Trusted by innovative teachers at
Every assignment, every subject
Analytic rubrics for essays and projects, holistic rubrics for writing, single-point rubrics for quick formative checks, AP-exam style rubrics for LEQs and DBQs — from a single prompt.
Analytic, holistic, or single-point structure
Criteria and descriptors matched to the assignment
Point totals that hit your target score exactly
Edit any cell before printing or exporting
Argumentative essay · 10th grade · 16 points total
| Criterion | Exceeds | Proficient |
|---|---|---|
Thesis 4 pts | Clear, original, arguable | Clear and defensible |
Evidence 4 pts | 3+ sources, all cited | 2 sources, mostly cited |
Organization 4 pts | Seamless transitions | Logical paragraphs |
Mechanics 4 pts | No errors | 1-2 minor errors |
Classroom-ready output
Paste a standard code (CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP) and criteria tighten to it. Everything is editable: rewrite descriptors, rebalance points, change labels — then print a clean PDF for the binder or attach to your LMS.
CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, C3, AP — paste the code and go
Inline-editable table (click any cell)
Print-ready PDF with headers and gridlines
Pairs with GradeWithAI to auto-grade against the rubric
Analytic, holistic, or single-point
Standards-aligned to CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP
Custom point totals (10, 25, 100, anything)
By subject or assignment type
Editable before printing
Export to PDF, print, or auto-grade
Designed for real classrooms
The small details that make an AI-generated rubric something you'd actually hand a class.
About this tool
The IB Extended Essay rubric is the International Baccalaureate's 34-point scoring guide for the 4,000-word independent research essay every Diploma Programme student has to complete. It's one of the three core DP requirements (alongside TOK and CAS) and its score, combined with the TOK grade, contributes up to 3 bonus points toward the 45-point Diploma total. The current IB EE rubric (in force since the May 2018 session) has 5 criteria: Criterion A Focus and Method (6 points), Criterion B Knowledge and Understanding (6 points), Criterion C Critical Thinking (12 points — the heaviest criterion), Criterion D Presentation (4 points), and Criterion E Engagement (6 points, assessed through the Reflections on Planning and Progress Form). Our IB Extended Essay rubric generator above reproduces the current IB criteria with the exact band descriptors and point values, and lets you tailor it for subject-specific supervision.
The IB EE rubric is weighted heavily toward analysis — Criterion C (Critical Thinking) alone is worth 12 of the 34 points, more than any other single criterion. Focus and Method and Knowledge and Understanding are each worth 6, Engagement is 6, and Presentation is the smallest at 4. Total: 34. The IB converts the 34 raw points into a letter grade from A to E, with A requiring approximately 27+ points, B roughly 21-26, C 14-20, D 7-13, and E 0-6. Students who earn an E on the EE or on TOK receive no diploma — the E is the one cliff in the system.
Criterion A — Focus and Method (6 pts): clear research question, sound topic, appropriate methodology
Criterion B — Knowledge and Understanding (6 pts): subject-appropriate sources, correct and nuanced understanding of concepts and terminology
Criterion C — Critical Thinking (12 pts): research, analysis, discussion and evaluation — the heart of the essay
Criterion D — Presentation (4 pts): structure, layout, formatting, citation consistency, adherence to IB formal requirements
Criterion E — Engagement (6 pts): assessed through the student's RPPF (Reflections on Planning and Progress Form), showing intellectual and personal engagement with the process
Criterion C (Critical Thinking) is where the top scores separate from the middle scores. It has four strands — research, analysis, discussion, and evaluation — each worth up to 3 points. Most students earn solid points on research (they found sources) and analysis (they discussed sources) but lose points on discussion and evaluation because they don't engage critically with the limitations of their own argument or sources. Second common failure: Criterion A, where students write a research question that's too broad ('What causes climate change?') instead of narrow enough to answer in 4,000 words. Third: Criterion E, where students treat the RPPF as a summary of what they did instead of genuine reflection on intellectual challenges and changes in thinking. Empty or formulaic RPPFs cap the Engagement score.
The generator outputs the full 5-criterion, 34-point rubric with IB's current descriptor language, including the sub-strands of Criterion C (research, analysis, discussion, evaluation). You can select the subject area (Biology, History, English A, Mathematics, Visual Arts, etc.) so the subject-specific guidance for Criterion B and methodology notes for Criterion A are appropriate. Common customizations IB supervisors request: a separate RPPF-only rubric for the three required reflection sessions, a progress-check rubric for the midway supervision meeting, a subject-specific methodology checklist (especially for science and math EEs), and a student-facing self-assessment aligned to all five criteria.
How it works
Paste the full instructions or describe it in one sentence. Include grade level, standards, and the rubric type (analytic/holistic/single-point) if you want.
Criteria and performance descriptors matched to the assignment, sized to the point total you picked.
Click any cell to rewrite. Export a clean PDF, or grade student work against this exact rubric inside GradeWithAI.
Hear from teachers who are saving time and providing better feedback.
“For Chadwick users, GradeWithAI has improved feedback efficiency and effectiveness, as it is grounded in existing platforms and is highly adaptable.”

“More impressive though is that it corrects student answers not simply using a pre-written answer, but by following the thought process they've pursued.”

“I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five.”

“GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded. That is a very valuable thing for the students.”

“GradeWithAI [provides] students with timely individualized feedback on their homework assignments and formative assessments. This is a job that is virtually impossible for a teacher to do on a regular basis.”

“Students have also appreciated the consistency and immediacy of the feedback I can provide through GradeWithAI. This has enabled them to make necessary corrections and achieve their desired scores on any assignment.”

After the rubric
The rubric generator is free forever. When you want to apply the rubric at scale, GradeWithAI scores handwritten and digital student work against it in seconds — per-criterion scores and descriptor-matched feedback.
Upload or sync student work from any LMS
AI grades against the exact rubric you built here
Works with typed and handwritten responses
Per-criterion scores and feedback in every report
Graded 28 essays against rubric
Period 4 · 92% class average · 14 seconds
Ava G.
9/10
Marcus R.
10/10
Priya S.
8/10
Got questions?
Answers to common questions from teachers. Still stuck? Email john@gradewithai.com — replies land the same day.
The IB uses approximate grade boundaries that can shift slightly per session, but typically: A = 27-34, B = 21-26, C = 14-20, D = 7-13, E = 0-6. Combined with the TOK grade, the EE letter grade contributes up to 3 bonus points toward the 45-point Diploma total via the TOK/EE matrix. An E on either EE or TOK is a failing condition — students receive no Diploma regardless of other scores.
Browse by subject, type, or exam
Pre-configured rubric generators for the assignments teachers ask for most — from argumentative essays to AP Lang rhetorical analysis.
Related tools
Join thousands of teachers who save 10+ hours every week with AI-powered rubric building and grading.
Free plan available · No credit card required
Teachers using GradeWithAI report grading in a fraction of the time, with richer feedback for every student.


