IB Extended Essay (EE) Rubric in seconds

Rubrics aligned with the International Baccalaureate Extended Essay criteria.

Free · No sign-up · PDF export · Any subject or grade

Rubric total will sum to this score.

Paste full instructions or describe in one sentence.

0/5000

Tip: Include the grade level and any standard codes for tighter alignment.

Trusted by innovative teachers at

Every assignment, every subject

One generator for every rubric type

Analytic rubrics for essays and projects, holistic rubrics for writing, single-point rubrics for quick formative checks, AP-exam style rubrics for LEQs and DBQs — from a single prompt.

  • Analytic, holistic, or single-point structure

  • Criteria and descriptors matched to the assignment

  • Point totals that hit your target score exactly

  • Edit any cell before printing or exporting

Argumentative essay · 10th grade · 16 points total

CriterionExceedsProficient

Thesis

4 pts

Clear, original, arguableClear and defensible

Evidence

4 pts

3+ sources, all cited2 sources, mostly cited

Organization

4 pts

Seamless transitionsLogical paragraphs

Mechanics

4 pts

No errors1-2 minor errors

Classroom-ready output

Printable PDFs, inline-editable, standards-aligned

Paste a standard code (CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP) and criteria tighten to it. Everything is editable: rewrite descriptors, rebalance points, change labels — then print a clean PDF for the binder or attach to your LMS.

  • CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, C3, AP — paste the code and go

  • Inline-editable table (click any cell)

  • Print-ready PDF with headers and gridlines

  • Pairs with GradeWithAI to auto-grade against the rubric

Analytic, holistic, or single-point

Standards-aligned to CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP

Custom point totals (10, 25, 100, anything)

By subject or assignment type

Editable before printing

Export to PDF, print, or auto-grade

Designed for real classrooms

Every detail, handled

The small details that make an AI-generated rubric something you'd actually hand a class.

Generated in 15 seconds
Skip the hour-long rubric-building tax. Rewrite cells in place and you're ready.
Standards-aligned
Paste a CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, or C3 code and alignment tightens immediately.
Point totals that add up
Set a target total (10, 25, 100) and the AI distributes points across criteria cleanly.
PDF, printable, binder-ready
Export clean, no-watermark PDFs. No sign-up, no trial, no credit card.

About this tool

IB Extended Essay (EE) Rubric in seconds

The IB Extended Essay rubric is the International Baccalaureate's 34-point scoring guide for the 4,000-word independent research essay every Diploma Programme student has to complete. It's one of the three core DP requirements (alongside TOK and CAS) and its score, combined with the TOK grade, contributes up to 3 bonus points toward the 45-point Diploma total. The current IB EE rubric (in force since the May 2018 session) has 5 criteria: Criterion A Focus and Method (6 points), Criterion B Knowledge and Understanding (6 points), Criterion C Critical Thinking (12 points — the heaviest criterion), Criterion D Presentation (4 points), and Criterion E Engagement (6 points, assessed through the Reflections on Planning and Progress Form). Our IB Extended Essay rubric generator above reproduces the current IB criteria with the exact band descriptors and point values, and lets you tailor it for subject-specific supervision.

The five IB EE criteria and their point values

The IB EE rubric is weighted heavily toward analysis — Criterion C (Critical Thinking) alone is worth 12 of the 34 points, more than any other single criterion. Focus and Method and Knowledge and Understanding are each worth 6, Engagement is 6, and Presentation is the smallest at 4. Total: 34. The IB converts the 34 raw points into a letter grade from A to E, with A requiring approximately 27+ points, B roughly 21-26, C 14-20, D 7-13, and E 0-6. Students who earn an E on the EE or on TOK receive no diploma — the E is the one cliff in the system.

  • Criterion A — Focus and Method (6 pts): clear research question, sound topic, appropriate methodology

  • Criterion B — Knowledge and Understanding (6 pts): subject-appropriate sources, correct and nuanced understanding of concepts and terminology

  • Criterion C — Critical Thinking (12 pts): research, analysis, discussion and evaluation — the heart of the essay

  • Criterion D — Presentation (4 pts): structure, layout, formatting, citation consistency, adherence to IB formal requirements

  • Criterion E — Engagement (6 pts): assessed through the student's RPPF (Reflections on Planning and Progress Form), showing intellectual and personal engagement with the process

Where IB EE students most often lose points

Criterion C (Critical Thinking) is where the top scores separate from the middle scores. It has four strands — research, analysis, discussion, and evaluation — each worth up to 3 points. Most students earn solid points on research (they found sources) and analysis (they discussed sources) but lose points on discussion and evaluation because they don't engage critically with the limitations of their own argument or sources. Second common failure: Criterion A, where students write a research question that's too broad ('What causes climate change?') instead of narrow enough to answer in 4,000 words. Third: Criterion E, where students treat the RPPF as a summary of what they did instead of genuine reflection on intellectual challenges and changes in thinking. Empty or formulaic RPPFs cap the Engagement score.

What the IB EE rubric generator produces

The generator outputs the full 5-criterion, 34-point rubric with IB's current descriptor language, including the sub-strands of Criterion C (research, analysis, discussion, evaluation). You can select the subject area (Biology, History, English A, Mathematics, Visual Arts, etc.) so the subject-specific guidance for Criterion B and methodology notes for Criterion A are appropriate. Common customizations IB supervisors request: a separate RPPF-only rubric for the three required reflection sessions, a progress-check rubric for the midway supervision meeting, a subject-specific methodology checklist (especially for science and math EEs), and a student-facing self-assessment aligned to all five criteria.

How it works

Assignment in, rubric out — in under a minute

  1. 1

    Describe the assignment

    Paste the full instructions or describe it in one sentence. Include grade level, standards, and the rubric type (analytic/holistic/single-point) if you want.

  2. 2

    AI drafts the rubric

    Criteria and performance descriptors matched to the assignment, sized to the point total you picked.

  3. 3

    Edit, print, grade

    Click any cell to rewrite. Export a clean PDF, or grade student work against this exact rubric inside GradeWithAI.

Loved by Educators

Hear from teachers who are saving time and providing better feedback.

For Chadwick users, GradeWithAI has improved feedback efficiency and effectiveness, as it is grounded in existing platforms and is highly adaptable.
Erin Nordlund
Erin Nordlund
Director of Teaching and Learning
More impressive though is that it corrects student answers not simply using a pre-written answer, but by following the thought process they've pursued.
Aaron Braskin
Aaron Braskin
T&E Department Head
I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five.
Rebecca Ford
Rebecca Ford
Astrophysics
GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded. That is a very valuable thing for the students.
Ken Brenan
Ken Brenan
Computer Science
GradeWithAI [provides] students with timely individualized feedback on their homework assignments and formative assessments. This is a job that is virtually impossible for a teacher to do on a regular basis.
Jason Robertson
Jason Robertson
AP Calculus
Students have also appreciated the consistency and immediacy of the feedback I can provide through GradeWithAI. This has enabled them to make necessary corrections and achieve their desired scores on any assignment.
Freddy Polanco
Freddy Polanco
AP US History

After the rubric

Now grade it just as fast

The rubric generator is free forever. When you want to apply the rubric at scale, GradeWithAI scores handwritten and digital student work against it in seconds — per-criterion scores and descriptor-matched feedback.

  • Upload or sync student work from any LMS

  • AI grades against the exact rubric you built here

  • Works with typed and handwritten responses

  • Per-criterion scores and feedback in every report

Graded 28 essays against rubric

Period 4 · 92% class average · 14 seconds

Ava G.

9/10

Marcus R.

10/10

Priya S.

8/10

Got questions?

Rubric generator FAQ

Answers to common questions from teachers. Still stuck? Email john@gradewithai.com — replies land the same day.

The IB uses approximate grade boundaries that can shift slightly per session, but typically: A = 27-34, B = 21-26, C = 14-20, D = 7-13, E = 0-6. Combined with the TOK grade, the EE letter grade contributes up to 3 bonus points toward the 45-point Diploma total via the TOK/EE matrix. An E on either EE or TOK is a failing condition — students receive no Diploma regardless of other scores.

Related tools

Pair with a lesson plan or quiz

Build the rubric. Grade with it just as fast.

Join thousands of teachers who save 10+ hours every week with AI-powered rubric building and grading.

Free plan available · No credit card required

10+hrs saved / week

Teachers using GradeWithAI report grading in a fraction of the time, with richer feedback for every student.

  • Erin Nordlund
  • Rebecca Ford
  • Ken Brenan
Trusted by innovative teachers at 1000+ schools