T-TESS (Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System) rubric generator. 4 domains — Planning, Instruction, Learning Environment, Professional Practices — with 5 performance levels.
Free · No sign-up · PDF export · Any subject or grade
Rubric total will sum to this score.
Paste full instructions or describe in one sentence.
0/5000
Tip: Include the grade level and any standard codes for tighter alignment.
Trusted by innovative teachers at
Every assignment, every subject
Analytic rubrics for essays and projects, holistic rubrics for writing, single-point rubrics for quick formative checks, AP-exam style rubrics for LEQs and DBQs — from a single prompt.
Analytic, holistic, or single-point structure
Criteria and descriptors matched to the assignment
Point totals that hit your target score exactly
Edit any cell before printing or exporting
Argumentative essay · 10th grade · 16 points total
| Criterion | Exceeds | Proficient |
|---|---|---|
Thesis 4 pts | Clear, original, arguable | Clear and defensible |
Evidence 4 pts | 3+ sources, all cited | 2 sources, mostly cited |
Organization 4 pts | Seamless transitions | Logical paragraphs |
Mechanics 4 pts | No errors | 1-2 minor errors |
Classroom-ready output
Paste a standard code (CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP) and criteria tighten to it. Everything is editable: rewrite descriptors, rebalance points, change labels — then print a clean PDF for the binder or attach to your LMS.
CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, C3, AP — paste the code and go
Inline-editable table (click any cell)
Print-ready PDF with headers and gridlines
Pairs with GradeWithAI to auto-grade against the rubric
Analytic, holistic, or single-point
Standards-aligned to CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP
Custom point totals (10, 25, 100, anything)
By subject or assignment type
Editable before printing
Export to PDF, print, or auto-grade
Designed for real classrooms
The small details that make an AI-generated rubric something you'd actually hand a class.
About this tool
The T-TESS rubric is the Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System — the state-mandated framework districts use to evaluate teachers in Texas public schools. Important: this is a rubric teachers are evaluated against, not one teachers use to grade students. T-TESS covers four domains — Planning, Instruction, Learning Environment, and Professional Practices and Responsibilities — each with multiple dimensions, and rates teachers on five performance levels: Distinguished, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing, and Improvement Needed. Proficient is the expectation for most teachers; Distinguished is reserved for exemplary, classroom-wide practice. Our t-tess rubric generator above builds the four-domain grid with all five levels of performance descriptors so appraisers, mentors, and teachers preparing for walk-throughs can work from the same language TEA uses.
T-TESS is organized into 4 domains containing 16 dimensions total. Appraisers score each dimension separately on the five-level scale. Unlike Danielson, T-TESS uses five levels rather than four — the extra 'Distinguished' tier above 'Accomplished' is designed to push master teachers toward continued growth.
Domain I — Planning: Standards/Alignment, Data/Assessment, Knowledge of Students, Activities
Domain II — Instruction: Achieving Expectations, Content Knowledge and Expertise, Communication, Differentiation, Monitor/Adjust
Domain III — Learning Environment: Classroom Environment/Routines/Procedures, Managing Student Behavior, Classroom Culture
Domain IV — Professional Practices and Responsibilities: Professional Demeanor/Ethics, Goal Setting, Professional Development, School Community Involvement
Performance levels: Distinguished, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing, Improvement Needed
Appraisers most often flag the 'Differentiation' dimension (II.4) in Developing — lessons that meet grade-level standards but don't adjust for students who are ahead or behind. Second is 'Monitor and Adjust' (II.5) — teachers who push through their lesson plan without shifting based on formative checks. Third, 'Managing Student Behavior' (III.2) trips up newer teachers because the Distinguished descriptor requires students to self-monitor, which is a cultural shift rather than a rule-based system. Fourth, 'Goal Setting' (IV.2) is often thin because teachers write SMART goals that are too easy to meet.
The generator builds all four domains with performance descriptors at each of the five levels — Distinguished, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing, Improvement Needed — for every dimension you request. You can generate the full 16-dimension version, focus on a single domain for a walk-through, or output a mentor-facing version with question prompts. Common customizations: a self-reflection version where teachers rate themselves before their appraiser visit, a side-by-side Proficient-to-Distinguished comparison to support growth plans, and a district-branded one-page summary for pre-conferences.
How it works
Paste the full instructions or describe it in one sentence. Include grade level, standards, and the rubric type (analytic/holistic/single-point) if you want.
Criteria and performance descriptors matched to the assignment, sized to the point total you picked.
Click any cell to rewrite. Export a clean PDF, or grade student work against this exact rubric inside GradeWithAI.
Hear from teachers who are saving time and providing better feedback.
“For Chadwick users, GradeWithAI has improved feedback efficiency and effectiveness, as it is grounded in existing platforms and is highly adaptable.”

“More impressive though is that it corrects student answers not simply using a pre-written answer, but by following the thought process they've pursued.”

“I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five.”

“GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded. That is a very valuable thing for the students.”

“GradeWithAI [provides] students with timely individualized feedback on their homework assignments and formative assessments. This is a job that is virtually impossible for a teacher to do on a regular basis.”

“Students have also appreciated the consistency and immediacy of the feedback I can provide through GradeWithAI. This has enabled them to make necessary corrections and achieve their desired scores on any assignment.”

After the rubric
The rubric generator is free forever. When you want to apply the rubric at scale, GradeWithAI scores handwritten and digital student work against it in seconds — per-criterion scores and descriptor-matched feedback.
Upload or sync student work from any LMS
AI grades against the exact rubric you built here
Works with typed and handwritten responses
Per-criterion scores and feedback in every report
Graded 28 essays against rubric
Period 4 · 92% class average · 14 seconds
Ava G.
9/10
Marcus R.
10/10
Priya S.
8/10
Got questions?
Answers to common questions from teachers. Still stuck? Email john@gradewithai.com — replies land the same day.
T-TESS is Texas-specific and uses five performance levels (Distinguished, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing, Improvement Needed) across four domains. Danielson is a national framework with four levels (Distinguished, Proficient, Basic, Unsatisfactory) across four somewhat different domains. T-TESS puts more explicit emphasis on student ownership and goal setting; Danielson more on questioning and assessment.
Browse by subject, type, or exam
Pre-configured rubric generators for the assignments teachers ask for most — from argumentative essays to AP Lang rhetorical analysis.
Related tools
Join thousands of teachers who save 10+ hours every week with AI-powered rubric building and grading.
Free plan available · No credit card required
Teachers using GradeWithAI report grading in a fraction of the time, with richer feedback for every student.


