Texas STAAR writing rubric generator aligned to TEA scoring guides for grade-level writing.
Free · No sign-up · PDF export · Any subject or grade
Rubric total will sum to this score.
Paste full instructions or describe in one sentence.
0/5000
Tip: Include the grade level and any standard codes for tighter alignment.
Trusted by innovative teachers at
Every assignment, every subject
Analytic rubrics for essays and projects, holistic rubrics for writing, single-point rubrics for quick formative checks, AP-exam style rubrics for LEQs and DBQs — from a single prompt.
Analytic, holistic, or single-point structure
Criteria and descriptors matched to the assignment
Point totals that hit your target score exactly
Edit any cell before printing or exporting
Argumentative essay · 10th grade · 16 points total
| Criterion | Exceeds | Proficient |
|---|---|---|
Thesis 4 pts | Clear, original, arguable | Clear and defensible |
Evidence 4 pts | 3+ sources, all cited | 2 sources, mostly cited |
Organization 4 pts | Seamless transitions | Logical paragraphs |
Mechanics 4 pts | No errors | 1-2 minor errors |
Classroom-ready output
Paste a standard code (CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP) and criteria tighten to it. Everything is editable: rewrite descriptors, rebalance points, change labels — then print a clean PDF for the binder or attach to your LMS.
CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, C3, AP — paste the code and go
Inline-editable table (click any cell)
Print-ready PDF with headers and gridlines
Pairs with GradeWithAI to auto-grade against the rubric
Analytic, holistic, or single-point
Standards-aligned to CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP
Custom point totals (10, 25, 100, anything)
By subject or assignment type
Editable before printing
Export to PDF, print, or auto-grade
Designed for real classrooms
The small details that make an AI-generated rubric something you'd actually hand a class.
About this tool
The STAAR writing rubric is the Texas Education Agency's analytic scoring guide for the written-composition items on the Texas State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness — the state accountability tests administered in grades 3-8 and the English I and II End-of-Course exams. Since the 2022-23 redesign, STAAR writing is scored for Organization/Progression of Ideas, Development of Ideas, and Use of Language and Conventions, typically on a 0-8 or 0-10 scale depending on grade and prompt type. Scoring is grade-specific — third-grade expectations are calibrated very differently from English II EOC. Our staar writing rubric generator above produces the TEA-aligned scoring sheet for the grade level and prompt type you're teaching, with descriptor language that matches how STAAR scorers norm.
STAAR writing uses three analytic traits across all grade levels, but the expectations scale up. A third-grade 'strong development of ideas' means 2-3 specific details per paragraph; an English II EOC 'strong development' expects extended analysis, varied evidence types, and sustained reasoning.
Organization/Progression: a clear central idea, logical structure, effective transitions, purposeful beginning and ending
Development of Ideas: specific details, examples, elaboration, and depth appropriate to grade and genre
Use of Language and Conventions: command of standard English grammar, usage, spelling, punctuation; grade-appropriate sentence variety
At elementary grades, the biggest score killer is an undeveloped middle — students write a clear opening and conclusion but give only 1-2 sentences per supporting idea. Middle graders often drop Language/Conventions points from run-on sentences and homophone errors (their/there, your/you're). English I and II EOC writers most often plateau because their analysis stays at the summary level — retelling the prompt's text rather than making an argument about it. TEA scorers also penalize off-topic responses hard; a thoughtful essay that drifts from the prompt caps at the middle score band.
The generator lets you select grade level (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, English I, English II) and prompt genre (informational, argumentative, narrative, analytical) and outputs a three-trait rubric with grade-appropriate descriptor language at each score band. Common Texas-teacher customizations: a student-friendly version with TEKS code references, a parent-facing one-pager for conferences, a side-by-side showing the same student response scored at a 2, 4, and 6 to norm the classroom, and a bilingual version for dual-language classrooms.
How it works
Paste the full instructions or describe it in one sentence. Include grade level, standards, and the rubric type (analytic/holistic/single-point) if you want.
Criteria and performance descriptors matched to the assignment, sized to the point total you picked.
Click any cell to rewrite. Export a clean PDF, or grade student work against this exact rubric inside GradeWithAI.
Hear from teachers who are saving time and providing better feedback.
“For Chadwick users, GradeWithAI has improved feedback efficiency and effectiveness, as it is grounded in existing platforms and is highly adaptable.”

“More impressive though is that it corrects student answers not simply using a pre-written answer, but by following the thought process they've pursued.”

“I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five.”

“GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded. That is a very valuable thing for the students.”

“GradeWithAI [provides] students with timely individualized feedback on their homework assignments and formative assessments. This is a job that is virtually impossible for a teacher to do on a regular basis.”

“Students have also appreciated the consistency and immediacy of the feedback I can provide through GradeWithAI. This has enabled them to make necessary corrections and achieve their desired scores on any assignment.”

After the rubric
The rubric generator is free forever. When you want to apply the rubric at scale, GradeWithAI scores handwritten and digital student work against it in seconds — per-criterion scores and descriptor-matched feedback.
Upload or sync student work from any LMS
AI grades against the exact rubric you built here
Works with typed and handwritten responses
Per-criterion scores and feedback in every report
Graded 28 essays against rubric
Period 4 · 92% class average · 14 seconds
Ava G.
9/10
Marcus R.
10/10
Priya S.
8/10
Got questions?
Answers to common questions from teachers. Still stuck? Email john@gradewithai.com — replies land the same day.
Several things: the stand-alone grade 4 and grade 7 writing tests were eliminated; written composition items were integrated into the ELAR tests at multiple grade levels; and the rubric consolidated older 4-point trait rubrics into the current three-trait analytic structure. The redesign also shifted toward shorter, source-based prompts rather than the classic extended personal-experience essay.
Browse by subject, type, or exam
Pre-configured rubric generators for the assignments teachers ask for most — from argumentative essays to AP Lang rhetorical analysis.
Related tools
Join thousands of teachers who save 10+ hours every week with AI-powered rubric building and grading.
Free plan available · No credit card required
Teachers using GradeWithAI report grading in a fraction of the time, with richer feedback for every student.


