WIDA writing rubric generator for ELL assessment. Aligned to the WIDA proficiency level descriptors.
Free · No sign-up · PDF export · Any subject or grade
Rubric total will sum to this score.
Paste full instructions or describe in one sentence.
0/5000
Tip: Include the grade level and any standard codes for tighter alignment.
Trusted by innovative teachers at
Every assignment, every subject
Analytic rubrics for essays and projects, holistic rubrics for writing, single-point rubrics for quick formative checks, AP-exam style rubrics for LEQs and DBQs — from a single prompt.
Analytic, holistic, or single-point structure
Criteria and descriptors matched to the assignment
Point totals that hit your target score exactly
Edit any cell before printing or exporting
Argumentative essay · 10th grade · 16 points total
| Criterion | Exceeds | Proficient |
|---|---|---|
Thesis 4 pts | Clear, original, arguable | Clear and defensible |
Evidence 4 pts | 3+ sources, all cited | 2 sources, mostly cited |
Organization 4 pts | Seamless transitions | Logical paragraphs |
Mechanics 4 pts | No errors | 1-2 minor errors |
Classroom-ready output
Paste a standard code (CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP) and criteria tighten to it. Everything is editable: rewrite descriptors, rebalance points, change labels — then print a clean PDF for the binder or attach to your LMS.
CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, C3, AP — paste the code and go
Inline-editable table (click any cell)
Print-ready PDF with headers and gridlines
Pairs with GradeWithAI to auto-grade against the rubric
Analytic, holistic, or single-point
Standards-aligned to CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, AP
Custom point totals (10, 25, 100, anything)
By subject or assignment type
Editable before printing
Export to PDF, print, or auto-grade
Designed for real classrooms
The small details that make an AI-generated rubric something you'd actually hand a class.
About this tool
The WIDA writing rubric — technically the WIDA Writing Rubric for grades 1-12 — is the proficiency-based scoring framework used across 40+ U.S. states (the WIDA Consortium) to assess English Language Learners' writing development. Unlike content rubrics that measure what a student knows, the wida writing rubric measures how a student is developing linguistically — how complex their sentences are, how accurately they use grammar, and how rich their vocabulary is in English. It scores writing on three features — Linguistic Complexity, Language Forms and Conventions, and Vocabulary Usage — across six proficiency levels from Entering (Level 1) to Reaching (Level 6). Our wida writing rubric generator above builds the three-feature, six-level grid with grade-banded descriptor language so EL teachers, content teachers, and ESOL coaches can use the same scoring language TEA and state assessments apply.
The WIDA Writing Rubric assesses language development, not content mastery. A Level 3 student writing about photosynthesis may understand the science but produce simpler sentences and fewer precise vocabulary terms than a Level 5 student writing about the same content. WIDA separates language progress from content progress intentionally.
Linguistic Complexity: length and variety of sentences, use of cohesive devices, organization appropriate to the task
Language Forms and Conventions: accuracy of grammar, syntax, and mechanics across increasing complexity
Vocabulary Usage: specificity of content-area and general academic vocabulary; use of precise, expressive, or technical words
Proficiency levels: 1 Entering, 2 Emerging, 3 Developing, 4 Expanding, 5 Bridging, 6 Reaching
The biggest mistake content teachers make is rating linguistic complexity based on content correctness rather than sentence-level complexity. A Level 2 'Emerging' student might correctly identify a chemical reaction using single words and phrases — the WIDA score reflects the language, not the content knowledge. Second, Language Forms and Conventions scores should be calibrated against the proficiency level — a Level 3 student using mostly present tense accurately earns high on that row; a Level 5 student who avoids complex structures to stay safe gets capped. Third, Vocabulary Usage rewards precision — 'cell' and 'mitochondria' used correctly in a Level 4 paper scores higher than 'cell' and 'part' even if the overall content is similar.
The generator produces the three-feature rubric across all six proficiency levels, tuned to the grade band you teach (1-2, 3-5, 6-8, or 9-12). You can narrow to specific levels (for example, a 3-5 rubric for a Developing-to-Expanding class), add content-specific vocabulary expectations, and output a teacher-facing version plus a student-facing 'Can Do' statement version. Common customizations: a side-by-side comparison of adjacent proficiency levels (Level 3 vs. Level 4) to make growth visible, a math- or science-specific content vocabulary column, and a parent-conference one-pager translating proficiency levels into what a student 'can do' in English.
How it works
Paste the full instructions or describe it in one sentence. Include grade level, standards, and the rubric type (analytic/holistic/single-point) if you want.
Criteria and performance descriptors matched to the assignment, sized to the point total you picked.
Click any cell to rewrite. Export a clean PDF, or grade student work against this exact rubric inside GradeWithAI.
Hear from teachers who are saving time and providing better feedback.
“For Chadwick users, GradeWithAI has improved feedback efficiency and effectiveness, as it is grounded in existing platforms and is highly adaptable.”

“More impressive though is that it corrects student answers not simply using a pre-written answer, but by following the thought process they've pursued.”

“I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five.”

“GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded. That is a very valuable thing for the students.”

“GradeWithAI [provides] students with timely individualized feedback on their homework assignments and formative assessments. This is a job that is virtually impossible for a teacher to do on a regular basis.”

“Students have also appreciated the consistency and immediacy of the feedback I can provide through GradeWithAI. This has enabled them to make necessary corrections and achieve their desired scores on any assignment.”

After the rubric
The rubric generator is free forever. When you want to apply the rubric at scale, GradeWithAI scores handwritten and digital student work against it in seconds — per-criterion scores and descriptor-matched feedback.
Upload or sync student work from any LMS
AI grades against the exact rubric you built here
Works with typed and handwritten responses
Per-criterion scores and feedback in every report
Graded 28 essays against rubric
Period 4 · 92% class average · 14 seconds
Ava G.
9/10
Marcus R.
10/10
Priya S.
8/10
Got questions?
Answers to common questions from teachers. Still stuck? Email john@gradewithai.com — replies land the same day.
A content rubric (like 6 Traits or STAAR) measures what a student can express — ideas, organization, development. WIDA measures how a student expresses it in English — complexity of sentences, accuracy of grammar, specificity of vocabulary. A student can score high on WIDA Linguistic Complexity while still working on content depth, and vice versa. For ELs, both scores tell teachers different things.
Browse by subject, type, or exam
Pre-configured rubric generators for the assignments teachers ask for most — from argumentative essays to AP Lang rhetorical analysis.
Related tools
Join thousands of teachers who save 10+ hours every week with AI-powered rubric building and grading.
Free plan available · No credit card required
Teachers using GradeWithAI report grading in a fraction of the time, with richer feedback for every student.


