"I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five."

Rebecca Ford
Astrophysics
GradeWithAI reads each student's work against your rubric criteria. The system generates specific comments that reference actual passages from their submission.
You review suggestions before students see them. Adjust tone, add personal notes, or clarify points in minutes instead of hours.
Free to try • No credit card required • Set up in 2 minutes

Trusted by teachers providing personalized feedback
Three clear phases from assignment upload to student delivery.
Upload your assignment and rubric once. The system evaluates each student's work against your stated criteria, identifying where they met expectations and where they fell short.
Comments reference specific passages or examples from their writing. Feedback points to actual sentences or paragraphs rather than making vague observations.
Suggestions appear in your dashboard as drafts. Adjust wording, add encouragement, or rewrite sections that miss the mark. This two-step process cuts grading time by 60-80% while maintaining your voice and standards.
The system does analytical work; you provide final judgment.
Comments tell students exactly what to improve. Instead of 'Needs work,' they see 'Your thesis in paragraph two clearly states your argument, but paragraph four drifts from this focus. Consider revising sentences 2-3 to reconnect to your main claim.'
Rubric criteria appear alongside feedback so students understand which standards they need to address.
"Needs work. Your argument could be stronger. Try to improve your writing."
"Your thesis in paragraph two clearly states your argument, but paragraph four drifts from this focus. Consider revising sentences 2-3 to reconnect to your main claim."
Surface patterns, plan interventions, and prepare for conferences using insights from actual student performance.
Which students struggled with thesis development this week?
What concepts should I reteach based on the last essay set?
Show me performance trends for Maria across the last 3 assignments.
Which rubric criteria had the lowest average scores?
Recommendation: Focus reteaching on counterargument construction. 12 students scored below proficient.
After grading, ask Kleo which students struggled with thesis development or evidence integration. The assistant analyzes rubric scores across your class and surfaces patterns.
Get answers in seconds instead of spending an hour reviewing submissions manually. Use insights to plan tomorrow's lesson or form intervention groups.
Kleo suggests reteaching strategies based on actual class performance. If 12 students scored low on counterargument, the assistant recommends focused activities for that specific concept.
Recommendations connect to rubric criteria where students underperformed. Intervention becomes targeted instead of generalized.
Before parent meetings or IEP discussions, ask Kleo for a student's performance trends. Review which skills improved and which remain challenging across assignments.
Reference concrete examples from graded work instead of relying on memory or vague impressions.
Concrete metrics from teachers using personalized AI feedback.
Teachers return graded assignments in 1-2 days instead of 2-3 weeks. Students receive guidance while the material is current, increasing the likelihood they'll apply it to their next submission.
Faster turnaround means students iterate within the same unit rather than repeating errors across multiple assignments.
A typical English teacher spends 8-12 hours grading a class set of essays. With GradeWithAI, that drops to 2-3 hours for review and refinement.
Reclaimed time goes toward lesson planning, student conferences, or simply avoiding weekend grading sessions.
When comments reference specific passages and rubric criteria, students understand what to improve. Teachers report higher revision quality and increased student engagement with feedback.
Specific guidance feels relevant instead of generic. Students act on suggestions because the comments point directly to their own writing.
"I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five."

Rebecca Ford
Astrophysics
"GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded."

Ken Brenan
Computer Science
AI handles analysis. You maintain final authority over every comment, score, and instructional decision.

AI suggestions populate your dashboard as drafts, not final comments. You adjust tone, add encouragement, or rewrite sections before students see anything.
This approach ensures consistent, thorough feedback without sacrificing the personal elements only you can provide.
GradeWithAI applies your rubric to student work. Upload your criteria and assignment parameters; the system learns your expectations and uses them for evaluation.
The system adapts to your teaching approach rather than imposing a standardized model. Whether you prioritize creativity, analysis, or technical precision, feedback aligns to your stated goals.
Hours saved on analytical grading go toward one-on-one conferences, targeted intervention, or lesson design. Teachers consistently report using reclaimed time for deeper student relationships and instructional improvements.
The system handles repetitive evaluation work so you focus on activities that require human judgment and connection.
No new platforms for students to learn. GradeWithAI connects to your existing tools.
Import assignments and rosters directly. Students submit through their usual platform; you access graded work in GradeWithAI. Grades and feedback sync back automatically with no double data entry.
Pull assignments and rosters from Canvas seamlessly. Students submit through their usual workflow; grades and feedback sync back to your Canvas gradebook automatically.
Connect your Schoology courses and import rosters directly. Grades and feedback sync back to Schoology automatically, keeping your gradebook current without manual updates.
Students upload essays as Google Docs, Word files, or PDFs. The system processes all standard formats without requiring students to learn new submission methods.
If students can submit to your current platform, they can submit to GradeWithAI. No additional training needed.
Begin with argumentative essays or another single assignment category before expanding. Many teachers test the system on one class period before rolling out to all sections.
Implementation scales at your pace. Build confidence with the tool gradually rather than committing to full classroom adoption immediately.
Your LMS
Assignments & rosters
GradeWithAI
AI grading & teacher review
Your LMS
Grades & feedback returned
Pilot
Test with one class or assignment type
Expand
Add more classes and formats
Adopt
Full integration across all sections
Grade your first assignment set free. No credit card required.