Individual Feedback for Every Student

Your Rubric Applied to Every Submission

GradeWithAI reads each student's work against your rubric criteria. The system generates specific comments that reference actual passages from their submission.

You review suggestions before students see them. Adjust tone, add personal notes, or clarify points in minutes instead of hours.

Free to try • No credit card required • Set up in 2 minutes

FERPA-Aligned
Canvas integrationGoogle Classroom integrationLMS integrations
GradeWithAI review dashboard showing personalized student feedback

Trusted by teachers providing personalized feedback

Upload, Review, Release

Three clear phases from assignment upload to student delivery.

01

AI Reads Each Submission Individually

Upload your assignment and rubric once. The system evaluates each student's work against your stated criteria, identifying where they met expectations and where they fell short.

Comments reference specific passages or examples from their writing. Feedback points to actual sentences or paragraphs rather than making vague observations.

02

You Review Before Students See Feedback

Suggestions appear in your dashboard as drafts. Adjust wording, add encouragement, or rewrite sections that miss the mark. This two-step process cuts grading time by 60-80% while maintaining your voice and standards.

The system does analytical work; you provide final judgment.

03

Students Receive Specific Guidance

Comments tell students exactly what to improve. Instead of 'Needs work,' they see 'Your thesis in paragraph two clearly states your argument, but paragraph four drifts from this focus. Consider revising sentences 2-3 to reconnect to your main claim.'

Rubric criteria appear alongside feedback so students understand which standards they need to address.

Generic vs. rubric-aligned feedback
Generic Feedback

"Needs work. Your argument could be stronger. Try to improve your writing."

Rubric-Aligned Feedback

"Your thesis in paragraph two clearly states your argument, but paragraph four drifts from this focus. Consider revising sentences 2-3 to reconnect to your main claim."

Kleo AI Assistant

Ask Questions About Your Class Data

Surface patterns, plan interventions, and prepare for conferences using insights from actual student performance.

Sample Kleo queries
?

Which students struggled with thesis development this week?

?

What concepts should I reteach based on the last essay set?

?

Show me performance trends for Maria across the last 3 assignments.

?

Which rubric criteria had the lowest average scores?

Kleo response
Thesis Development68% proficient
Evidence Integration45% proficient
Counterargument32% proficient

Recommendation: Focus reteaching on counterargument construction. 12 students scored below proficient.

Identify Patterns Without Reading Every Paper

After grading, ask Kleo which students struggled with thesis development or evidence integration. The assistant analyzes rubric scores across your class and surfaces patterns.

Get answers in seconds instead of spending an hour reviewing submissions manually. Use insights to plan tomorrow's lesson or form intervention groups.

Receive Instructional Recommendations

Kleo suggests reteaching strategies based on actual class performance. If 12 students scored low on counterargument, the assistant recommends focused activities for that specific concept.

Recommendations connect to rubric criteria where students underperformed. Intervention becomes targeted instead of generalized.

Prepare for Conferences with Data

Before parent meetings or IEP discussions, ask Kleo for a student's performance trends. Review which skills improved and which remain challenging across assignments.

Reference concrete examples from graded work instead of relying on memory or vague impressions.

Turnaround Time and Grading Hours

Concrete metrics from teachers using personalized AI feedback.

1-2 Days

Feedback Delivered in 1-2 Days

Teachers return graded assignments in 1-2 days instead of 2-3 weeks. Students receive guidance while the material is current, increasing the likelihood they'll apply it to their next submission.

Faster turnaround means students iterate within the same unit rather than repeating errors across multiple assignments.

60-80%

Grading Time Reduced by 60-80%

A typical English teacher spends 8-12 hours grading a class set of essays. With GradeWithAI, that drops to 2-3 hours for review and refinement.

Reclaimed time goes toward lesson planning, student conferences, or simply avoiding weekend grading sessions.

Higher

Students Use Feedback More Often

When comments reference specific passages and rubric criteria, students understand what to improve. Teachers report higher revision quality and increased student engagement with feedback.

Specific guidance feels relevant instead of generic. Students act on suggestions because the comments point directly to their own writing.

"I've really enjoyed using the GradeWithAI program. It saves me a ton of time, especially when I have class sizes of 35 or 36 students times five."

Rebecca Ford

Rebecca Ford

Astrophysics

"GradeWithAI doesn't just grade. It gives the student reasoning as to why every point is awarded or not awarded."

Ken Brenan

Ken Brenan

Computer Science

Typical grading timeline
Before GradeWithAI
Day 1
Collect essays
Day 2–14
Grade manually (8-12 hrs)
Day 15+
Return feedback
With GradeWithAI
Day 1
Upload & AI grades
Day 2
Review & refine (2-3 hrs)
Day 2
Release feedback
Full Teacher Control

You Set Criteria and Review Output

AI handles analysis. You maintain final authority over every comment, score, and instructional decision.

Teacher editing AI-generated feedback before releasing to students

Review Every Comment Before Release

AI suggestions populate your dashboard as drafts, not final comments. You adjust tone, add encouragement, or rewrite sections before students see anything.

This approach ensures consistent, thorough feedback without sacrificing the personal elements only you can provide.

Your Rubric Defines the Standards

GradeWithAI applies your rubric to student work. Upload your criteria and assignment parameters; the system learns your expectations and uses them for evaluation.

The system adapts to your teaching approach rather than imposing a standardized model. Whether you prioritize creativity, analysis, or technical precision, feedback aligns to your stated goals.

Spend Saved Time on High-Impact Work

Hours saved on analytical grading go toward one-on-one conferences, targeted intervention, or lesson design. Teachers consistently report using reclaimed time for deeper student relationships and instructional improvements.

The system handles repetitive evaluation work so you focus on activities that require human judgment and connection.

Teacher review capabilities
Adjust feedback tone and emphasis
Add personal encouragement
Rewrite or remove AI suggestions
Set rubric criteria and weights
Control when students see feedback
Regenerate with new instructions

Works with Your LMS and File Formats

No new platforms for students to learn. GradeWithAI connects to your existing tools.

Connects to Google Classroom, Canvas, and Schoology

Google Classroom

Google Classroom

Import assignments and rosters directly. Students submit through their usual platform; you access graded work in GradeWithAI. Grades and feedback sync back automatically with no double data entry.

Canvas

Canvas

Pull assignments and rosters from Canvas seamlessly. Students submit through their usual workflow; grades and feedback sync back to your Canvas gradebook automatically.

Schoology

Schoology

Connect your Schoology courses and import rosters directly. Grades and feedback sync back to Schoology automatically, keeping your gradebook current without manual updates.

Accepts Common File Formats

Students upload essays as Google Docs, Word files, or PDFs. The system processes all standard formats without requiring students to learn new submission methods.

If students can submit to your current platform, they can submit to GradeWithAI. No additional training needed.

Start with One Assignment Type

Begin with argumentative essays or another single assignment category before expanding. Many teachers test the system on one class period before rolling out to all sections.

Implementation scales at your pace. Build confidence with the tool gradually rather than committing to full classroom adoption immediately.

Sync workflow

Your LMS

Assignments & rosters

GradeWithAI

AI grading & teacher review

Your LMS

Grades & feedback returned

Typical implementation path
1

Pilot

Test with one class or assignment type

2

Expand

Add more classes and formats

3

Adopt

Full integration across all sections

Plans and Trial Access

Grade your first assignment set free. No credit card required.

Free
$0/month
Perfect for trying out AI grading.
  • 25 AI requests/month
  • Google Classroom integration
  • Canvas integration
  • Google Forms grading
  • Handwritten assignment support
  • AI rubric generation
  • Custom instructions
  • Unlimited Kleo AI assistant
Most Popular
Pro
$20/month
Unlimited grading for dedicated educators.
  • Unlimited AI requests
  • Automated submissions grading
  • AI detection on every submission
  • Custom instructions
  • Everything in Free
Schools & Districts
Custom
Enterprise features for your entire school.
  • Microsoft Teams integration
  • Schoology integration (coming soon)
  • Bulk user management
  • Admin dashboard & analytics
  • SSO / SAML authentication
  • Dedicated onboarding & training
  • Everything in Pro
Secure payments via Stripe
Cancel anytime
10,000+ teachers trust us

Common Questions About the System

Answers about functionality, pedagogy, privacy, and implementation.

Personalized feedback starts here

Join thousands of teachers providing individualized guidance to every student.

Free plan available • No credit card required